Imagine a nation where extreme poverty could vanish by 2026—ambitious, yes, but that's exactly what Indonesia's government is shooting for with bold new initiatives targeting its most vulnerable families. It's a heartfelt promise that could change lives forever, but will it truly lift everyone up? Let's dive in and see how they're planning to make it happen.
In Jakarta, Coordinating Minister for Community Empowerment Muhaimin Iskandar unveiled exciting programs designed to equip and support those living in dire poverty. Picture this: families deemed extremely poor will gain access to specialized training sessions lasting up to four months, focusing on practical skills like becoming security guards, agricultural laborers, or even professionals in cleaning services. The real game-changer? Upon completion, these individuals won't be left job hunting—they'll step straight into employment opportunities provided by willing employers. This approach isn't just about learning; it's about creating immediate pathways to stability and income.
But here's where it gets interesting—beyond just job skills, the administration is rolling out land redistribution through their agrarian reform efforts. Think of it as giving a fresh start in farming: vast tracts of government-owned land, reclaimed for public benefit, will be handed over primarily to those in the agricultural sector who are struggling the most. The goal? To empower these families to cultivate the land effectively, build self-sufficient lives, and break free from the cycle of poverty. As Iskandar explained, this could mean millions of hectares becoming available, directly benefiting about 49 percent of Indonesia's extremely poor population who already toil in agriculture. For beginners wondering why this matters, imagine a farmer who once scraped by on rented plots suddenly owning fertile ground—it's like upgrading from a leaky boat to a sturdy ship, allowing for better crops, savings, and even generational wealth.
And this is the part most people miss—these efforts aren't isolated; they're part of a larger, data-driven strategy to combat poverty. The plans were hashed out in a closed-door session on community strengthening and anti-poverty tactics, chaired by President Prabowo Subianto alongside his cabinet. Iskandar highlighted how this signals a fresh way of thinking under Prabowo's leadership, shifting focus toward asset ownership for the poorest groups—specifically what they call decile 1 communities, the bottom 10 percent economically. Technicalities are still being ironed out, but the idea is to distribute productive assets like land to farmers, fostering long-term independence rather than short-term handouts.
Now, let's talk numbers to ground this in reality: According to Statistics Indonesia (BPS), around 2.38 million people are currently entrenched in extreme poverty. The administration's target? Eradicating that entirely by 2026—a lofty but inspiring aim that could set a global example if successful. To make sure help goes where it's needed most, they'll rely on the National Socioeconomic Single Data (DTSEN), a comprehensive database that ensures precision in identifying and assisting beneficiaries. This avoids wasting resources on those who don't qualify, making the programs more efficient and impactful.
For more context, check out this related piece: Prabowo pushes data-driven strategy to cut poverty rate: minister (https://en.antaranews.com/news/389465/prabowo-pushes-data-driven-strategy-to-cut-poverty-rate-minister). And here's another: Ministry bolsters community empowerment as poverty rate declines (https://en.antaranews.com/news/369225/ministry-bolsters-community-empowerment-as-poverty-rate-declines).
But here's where it gets controversial—while these initiatives sound transformative, skeptics might wonder if training alone can overcome deep-rooted barriers like lack of education or market access. Is redistributing land enough, or could it spark disputes over ownership? And what about sustainability—will these families maintain productivity without ongoing support? It's a debate worth having: do you believe government-led empowerment truly ends poverty, or is it just a band-aid on a systemic wound? Share your thoughts in the comments—do you agree with this approach, or do you see potential pitfalls? Let's hear your perspective and keep the conversation going!
Translator: Resinta Sulistiyandari
Editor: Rahmad Nasution
Copyright © ANTARA 2025
